Q.C. Zhang From Relation to Reality

A Super-Calabi–Yau Reading of the Cosmological-Constant Exponent: Vol(CP^(3|4)) = 0

The naked Berezinian integral and the super-Fubini–Study volume of CP^(3|4) both vanish identically by the super-Calabi–Yau condition. A spin-dependent extension recovers Λ and α_G exponents and predicts a spin-1 partner.

Published
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19981300

Abstract

The empirical relations ΛℓPl2=(α4/4π)(me/mPl)5\Lambda \ell_{\rm Pl}^2 = (\alpha^4/4\pi)(m_e/m_{\rm Pl})^5 and G me2/(ℏc)=α8ye5G\,m_e^2/(\hbar c) = \alpha^8 y_e^5 have unexplained α4\alpha^4 and α8\alpha^8 exponents. We observe that the naked integral of the canonical Berezinian on Witten’s super-twistor space CP3∣4\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}, and the super-Fubini–Study volume of the same supermanifold, both vanish identically by the super-Calabi–Yau condition m=n+1m = n+1. The vanishing is computed explicitly through Voronov’s volume formula

Vol(CPn∣m)  =  R2(n−m) πn 2mΓ(n−m+1),\mathrm{Vol}(\mathbb{CP}^{n|m}) \;=\; \frac{R^{2(n-m)} \, \pi^n \, 2^m}{\Gamma(n-m+1)},

in which the super-CY locus appears as a Γ\Gamma-function pole. The lower strata CP1∣0\mathbb{CP}^{1|0} and CP2∣2\mathbb{CP}^{2|2} in the natural super-flag chain have non-vanishing super-volumes, so the vanishing is specific to the super-CY top stratum.

The natural twistor encoding of the spacetime cosmological-constant operator ∫d4x−g\int d^4x\sqrt{-g} is an integral over the moduli of holomorphic lines (chiral superspace M4∣8≃G(2∣0,4∣4)\mathbb{M}^{4|8} \simeq G(2|0, 4|4)), not an ambient integral over CP3∣4\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}, so the Voronov vanishing does not directly apply to vacuum energy. The relevant curve-moduli super-volume vol(G(2∣0,4∣4))\mathrm{vol}(G(2|0, 4|4)) is, however, also rigorously zero: Honey 2021 §5.5 proves that vol(Grr∣s(Cp∣q))=0\mathrm{vol}(\mathrm{Gr}_{r|s}(\mathbb{C}^{p|q})) = 0 when p=qp = q, by direct examination of the integrand. So both the ambient vanishing on CP3∣4\mathbb{CP}^{3|4} and the curve-moduli vanishing on G(2∣0,4∣4)G(2|0, 4|4) are theorems.

Earlier versions of this note proposed that these structural vanishings supply a Berezinian-saturation selection rule for the empirical α4\alpha^4 exponent. We retract that mechanism here. Section 4.4 systematically tests four concrete non-standard candidate constructions — twistor composite half-DD-term projection (Koster–Mitev–Staudacher–Wilhelm style), massive two-twistor worldline with doubled fermionic zero-modes (Penrose–Perjés / Albonico–Geyer–Mason), graph-supermanifold rank filter (Marcolli–Rej style), and local-RG / Weyl-anomaly β2\beta^2 norm with gravitational tadpole (Osborn / Komargodski–Schwimmer) — and finds each fails at a specific load-bearing obstruction pinned to published formalism. The §4 discussion is retained as motivation; future derivations must address the four obstructions identified.

A spin-dependent extension Qs∝α2(s+2)Q_s \propto \alpha^{2(s+2)} recovers both observed exponents and predicts a spin-1 partner with Yukawa coupling strength αY≡Qs=1/Qs=2≈1.88×104\alpha_Y \equiv Q_{s=1}/Q_{s=2} \approx 1.88\times 10^4 relative to gravity. Existing Yukawa-fifth-force bounds (Geraci et al. 2008) exclude the prediction for ranges λ≳10 μ\lambda \gtrsim 10\,\mum and confine any surviving spin-1 mediator to m≳20m \gtrsim 20–40 meV. The spin-dependent extension is offered as a conjecture, not a derivation; the volume-vanishing observation is offered as a structural fact.

The empirical relations reported here are also reviewed in the companion DAEDALUS review, where they are classified as Cabibbo-scenario regularities; in the broader Twistor Configuration Geometry (TCG) framework, an alternative geometric setting reproduces the same factorial/Fibonacci combinatorics via real configuration spaces as the FPA model, rather than via super-twistor Berezinian integration.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19981300